(08-20-2014, 04:57 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: [ -> ](The lack of any sign of bottom screen in the one that the Shulk model appears is because it probably stays black and pops-up the results later like you can see in here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAwX2adg2kI#t=248).
Well okay that's me being dumb
As for the photos and videos thing, I can see that too, but I dunno. These pics still rub me the wrong way.
(08-20-2014, 02:32 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: [ -> ]- Today's Famitsu scan showed a part of the Tomodachi Life stage that is in the leak and hasn't been shown before till now
Which part of the stage was "leaked"? I have to look at that.
(08-20-2014, 02:32 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: [ -> ]- Bottom row has a "clone" corner. What leaker would ever do this?
I dunno, all of them? The thing that would make this leak believable is having the clones be with their respective series.
(08-20-2014, 05:08 PM)LuigiofTime Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2014, 02:32 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: [ -> ]- Today's Famitsu scan showed a part of the Tomodachi Life stage that is in the leak and hasn't been shown before till now
Which part of the stage was "leaked"? I have to look at that.
One of the rooms, I can't find the image now though.
EDIT: There you go
http://i.imgur.com/aoYlUTC.png
(08-20-2014, 05:08 PM)LuigiofTime Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2014, 02:32 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: [ -> ]- Bottom row has a "clone" corner. What leaker would ever do this?
I dunno, all of them? The thing that would make this leak believable is having the clones be with their respective series.
Ya can't be serious. So, guy makes a lot of in-style very detailed 3D models, but fucks up on series placement, which is one of the most obvious things in Smash since ever? If anything, if someone were to play it safe, they would put them next to their series like you said. But the fact that they still have a logic to them and are put really far, makes it -even more belieavble-
(08-20-2014, 08:32 AM)Sportoise Wrote: [ -> ]Should someone call a plumber? I think the pipes are leaking again
![[Image: tumblr_nal8xjVkXn1r1ws08o3_1280.png]](https://37.media.tumblr.com/292602f2c759c8c152062ac005f07dad/tumblr_nal8xjVkXn1r1ws08o3_1280.png)
"Disablad"
Ok, leak.
Also, don't get fooled by those precious renders. There are people with enough Photoshopping skill to create images of that caliber.
Exhibit A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m8e3bYfGSY
![[Image: FkvOCoH.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/FkvOCoH.jpg)
yeah changin the clothes of an existing render is really the same as creating a character from scratch~
I'm also waiting for someone to stop focusing on those last leaks that are admitedelly not even from the same font. (Besides, the quality on that one is so bad you can't really make out if it's disablad or disabled)
I'm not trusting these leaks right now. Too much doesn't seem right about them...
But if they are in fact real (like the Palutena one from a while back appeared to be at first), then I really want to know what Nintendo was thinking of when they let the freakin' Duck Hunt Dog become a playable character over countless other, better choices.
(That and the Ice Climbers not technically returning, they were my favourites in Melee and Brawl.)
That's the only one I would be extremely disappointed in, although I'd be slightly disappointed if Dark Pit and Dr. Mario got their own slots as well.(Lucina is way more than an alternate costume, fuqq the haters)
(08-20-2014, 05:43 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: [ -> ](Besides, the quality on that one is so bad you can't really make out if it's disablad or disabled)
You can EASILY tell that says disablad, honestly, not trying to knock ya, but that's clear as day.
(08-20-2014, 06:29 PM)Gwen Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2014, 05:43 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: [ -> ](Besides, the quality on that one is so bad you can't really make out if it's disablad or disabled)
You can EASILY tell that says disablad, honestly, not trying to knock ya, but that's clear as day.
I can see disablad, but it doesn't line up or seems to be the same as the other "a" in the word.
I think that just adds to the likeliness of it being fake.
Honestly if these are real and they want us to believe them they could at least take some video footage and not just snapshots of the screen. This is 2014 for crying out loud; my phone can record video and it's a cheap-ass twenty-dollar Tracfone. Snapshots are easy to fake, video not quite so much.
(08-20-2014, 10:36 AM)soulcaliburfan Wrote: [ -> ]I will only be somewhat convinced of this once I see...
An in-game screenshot of the Duck Hunt Dog.
Also this is a good point.
And yeah, that does really look way more like an "a" than an "e" in my opinion.
I know you guys want to keep believing this is fake and all but... wasn't one of the stages we haven't seen anywhere else except the leak shown off in a recent Famitsu thing? That pretty much confirms it right there.
(08-20-2014, 06:41 PM)Gwen Wrote: [ -> ]I think that just adds to the likeliness of it being fake.
or maybe
it's an "e"????
(08-20-2014, 06:44 PM)Drshnaps Wrote: [ -> ]Honestly if these are real and they want us to believe them they could at least take some video footage and not just snapshots of the screen. This is 2014 for crying out loud; my phone can record video and it's a cheap-ass twenty-dollar Tracfone. Snapshots are easy to fake, video not quite so much.
(08-20-2014, 10:36 AM)soulcaliburfan Wrote: [ -> ]I will only be somewhat convinced of this once I see...
An in-game screenshot of the Duck Hunt Dog.
Also this is a good point.
And yeah, that does really look way more like an "a" than an "e" in my opinion.
Like, this was taken on an ESRB office, in which a bunch of people work togheter and talk, which do you think is more likely to be traced back, a video with potential voices or a screenshot? Let's remember the last Pokémon X/Y leak nobody believed were just screenshots too.
And again, it's a pre-made video made by Nintendo, the leaker has no control in which character is shown in a match or not.
(08-20-2014, 06:53 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2014, 06:41 PM)Gwen Wrote: [ -> ]I think that just adds to the likeliness of it being fake.
or maybe
it's an "e"????
I don't know what to tell you other than, that's not an "e". It's incredibly easy to tell it's an "a"