No, Rock Paper Scissors has already been decided, and ghost humanoids wouldn't really make a good trio, seeing as they'll be all the same
maybe the paper pokemon can be an origami
Well, the muse ideas have already been confirmed, I think. And sorry to say, Scelete wouldn't look like like a humanoid muse if it were an origami. So maybe we can save that idea for something else, as it does sound good. For now though we should really stick with the ideas that have already been discussed, as was announced previously.
Also Matt did you ever color in those Paleo Pokemon?
Still not 100% confirmed. I still kinda want to see the trio with a warrior design to before we finalize them.
Muses are about creativity. But Rock, Paper, Scissors, is about competitiveness. I just happen to think warriors fit the bill better.
maybe the scissors legendary can be a a giant pair of scissors with guilotenes as hands
maybe the rock lengendary can be a amgamation of coral and gems
you know what, that sounds like shit.
as they are three legendary pokémons, they are bound to each other, therefore there has to be a common ground to all three. your suggestion does not sound like a pokémon at all and i do not see a relation between them.
considering rock, paper, scissors as a hand game, i would suggest pokémon based off hands/hand shaped animals/squid/octopi or something like that.
(04-26-2011, 12:06 PM)Ike Wrote: [ -> ]The Hekatonkheires/Hundred Handed Ones? There's three of them
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hekatonkheires
That's actually a great idea. Alex Kidd in the Enchanted Castle, famous for it's Rock Paper Scissors or Janken minigames, had a final boss like that.
I endorse this suggestion.
Cool idea indeed. But won't that remind a little too much of Machamp ?
(04-26-2011, 02:49 PM)Zenaki Jenkins Wrote: [ -> ]Cool idea indeed. But won't that remind a little too much of Machamp ?
Well, I'm not actually sure what they would look like as Pokemon, but they'd probably have more arms than Machamp
Since we've been trying to decide between basing them on warriors and making them look like little girls, why don't we just go with warrior girls?
(04-26-2011, 10:25 PM)KP Shadow Wrote: [ -> ]Since we've been trying to decide between basing them on warriors and making them look like little girls, why don't we just go with warrior girls?
Well see the complication of that is that we aren't just going for girls, we are going for muses. Like the idea of the Pokemon is based on creativity, like the muses are based on creativity. It's not just girls.
I beg to differ. When I think of Rock Paper Scissors, I also think of thumb wars, and arm wrestling, these games are based on "war", so warriors seems to be the better fit to me.
Yes, I was just saying that the concept wasnt just girls, it was muses.
I don't think we should specifically make them girl warriors. I do agree with the warriors thing.