GAMER LOUNGE 20XX (NO CASUALS!!)

[Kosheh]

a-are people really getting behind a soapboxing kotaku editor on this one? waht

I don't know, I don't read Kotaku very often (and certainly not enough to follow their journalistic bullpen). I was just putting it forward that there are arguments for Ms. Pac-Man's inclusion other than the fact that it's Ms. Pac-Man (which is what was stated in the post I responded to).

Then it was clarified that the majority of the vocal proponents for Ms. Pac-Man's inclusion only argued on behalf of the character's gender and not really anything else to do with the game itself.

I don't know what you want out of that huge post, Kosheh.

I'm...not sure either. I'm referring to this Kotaku article.
The writer is complaining about the game itself not making it into the Hall of Fame due to the fact that it's the superior title.
Meanwhile, people are...apparently making this into an issue of gender? And that's...where I'm lost. Am I missing something? Am I only reading half of the article?