10-03-2016, 01:06 PM
tbh "You're a bunch of stupid, naive masochists who apparently love being abused by the same people over and over again" doesnt really carry the message of "the staff made a bad decision"
that my unban is this straw that broke the camels back and your claim to "knowing me personally" and using that as a reason why your judgement supersedes the forum staff's is all really blatant evidence that this is personal. skelesam came back a day before i made the CherryBerry alt. he and you have personal history. and yet it wasnt until i was unbanned that you broke a 9-month hiatus to warn the "stupid, naive masochists" and "horrible" prominent members of the userbase. that doesnt fly at all. i mean you have a law video game character in your avatar; your argument of "dont unban sengir" is definitely a valid prosecution but your case is flimsier than a white corn tortilla and you totally know that. my one chance (blank) was banned after a very mild argument with kriven (which is hilarious considering theres a literal political debate topic open right now and its way rougher than calling someone a bad word over their views on the philosophy of authorship). heck, viper admitted to not wanting blank to be active at all. so if you can list every other chance (ban-on-sight isnt a chance) i'd be down to listen, but blank's most important crime was dodging a self-imposed ban which makes it already an iffy "chance"
again, id be happy to chat over PMs since this is very obviously personal despite "i dont care"s followed by "i know her"s and childhood anecdotes
that my unban is this straw that broke the camels back and your claim to "knowing me personally" and using that as a reason why your judgement supersedes the forum staff's is all really blatant evidence that this is personal. skelesam came back a day before i made the CherryBerry alt. he and you have personal history. and yet it wasnt until i was unbanned that you broke a 9-month hiatus to warn the "stupid, naive masochists" and "horrible" prominent members of the userbase. that doesnt fly at all. i mean you have a law video game character in your avatar; your argument of "dont unban sengir" is definitely a valid prosecution but your case is flimsier than a white corn tortilla and you totally know that. my one chance (blank) was banned after a very mild argument with kriven (which is hilarious considering theres a literal political debate topic open right now and its way rougher than calling someone a bad word over their views on the philosophy of authorship). heck, viper admitted to not wanting blank to be active at all. so if you can list every other chance (ban-on-sight isnt a chance) i'd be down to listen, but blank's most important crime was dodging a self-imposed ban which makes it already an iffy "chance"
again, id be happy to chat over PMs since this is very obviously personal despite "i dont care"s followed by "i know her"s and childhood anecdotes