08-08-2014, 01:05 PM
1) We're leaving the articles on people to their User pages. They don't need to be about the user if the user doesn't want it to be. It can just be their sort of public notepad.
2) I don't think it should be squished. It'd look super weird if we did that, and a waste of space on the left and right.
3) I don't think we should really bother adding extra user groups for the sake of 20 extra posts, since they also need to be a member for a month. And any edits can easily be reversed, and abuse of the wiki can result in real forum bans. You're assuming users are going to look to rush posts so they can help our wiki - I don't see this as a bad thing.
4) There will be no governing of edits or new pages. That gets rid of the point of it being a wiki. Users can moderate it, in a sense, and when we need to step in to ban someone, we can. We have a great community and they don't need to be treated like they should be policed for contributing their knowledge.
2) I don't think it should be squished. It'd look super weird if we did that, and a waste of space on the left and right.
3) I don't think we should really bother adding extra user groups for the sake of 20 extra posts, since they also need to be a member for a month. And any edits can easily be reversed, and abuse of the wiki can result in real forum bans. You're assuming users are going to look to rush posts so they can help our wiki - I don't see this as a bad thing.
4) There will be no governing of edits or new pages. That gets rid of the point of it being a wiki. Users can moderate it, in a sense, and when we need to step in to ban someone, we can. We have a great community and they don't need to be treated like they should be policed for contributing their knowledge.