06-01-2008, 11:02 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-01-2008, 11:10 AM by Sho_"Rocker"_Daisuke.)
Yawackhary Wrote:The main thing is to fix the camera/collision detection/controls which are getting worser each game (fully aware that even Sonic 2 and 3/K had their fair share of problems) plus Sonic doesn't need that booster for every loop that he goes through in the 3D games, one or two is fine but every one?
you've got a point there, like usually, when you're going into a loop, you're going hill at break-neck speed already, there's really no need for those stupid boosts, maybe when you're going at it slowly and it's flat land
Yawackhary Wrote:What happened to the Green Hills/Chemical Plants/Scrap Brains and all the memorable levels from the classics? Okay so Green Hill went around the block a few times but there are many zones that need reviving or based on instead of Santorini zone in Unleashed.
Better level design. I must admit, even though Rush and Rush Adventure were the closest feel to the classics and indeed the only modern Sonic games that I own past Heroes - the main problem was the level design with bottomless pits everywhere and a similar pattern to every level.
by the looks of how the stages looked back then, to me they looked a little too robotic, and maybe even a bit "out-dated", so maybe Sonic had destroyed them and/or restored them to their origanal nature look, I could agree that they renew some of their older stages, but not that often. You'll find that often in Mario games, stages like Mushroom Kingdom, Bowser's Castle, and the Haunted Mansion stages are redone in almost every game.
Yawackhary Wrote:Dr. Robotnik being the boss again - not only that but being the final boss. The boss taking over Robotnik was fine in SA because it was unique but now it is the same over and over again.
Cut the cast - way down. Sonic, Tails, Knuckles and Robotnik is all - maybe Amy for a quick ending scene or something. The main problem with most games are the useless characters being in every game (Cream, Marine and even Shadow) and turning it to the Sonic that I don't know/want to know.
I like the addition of all those characters, but then again, sometimes they're just there and don't really play a big part in the story, you have somewhat of a point, but more characters can mean a bigger story line, maybe in a couple of games it's only the original 4.
Yawackhary Wrote:A game that respects the classic fans which are now dying like fly sprays (aka classic Sonic design [black eye and all], special stages, Chaos Emeralds not being used as plot device unless it is absolutely needed and minimist story which doesn't need cutscenes) but that is pipe dream.
in my own personal opinion, I think the older Sonic looks rediculous, he looked a litle too fat, and a little too kiddish to me, but hey, this is all just my opinion, every single last word of it.
'cept for the quotes, that's your opinion
Geo the Fox Wrote:1. Sonic Pinball Party is a pinball game on the GBA that also has a Chao Garden. The point is that it's not a platformer game, yet it has a fully functional Chao Garden. Therefore, the Chao Garden does not necessarily need platforming. Maybe Sonic, but not platforming. That said, it's really stupid to put that level of emphasis on a moderate-sized add-on to two great Sonic games. It's not like I hate the Chao Garden, of course. It's just not necessary to add on. If Sonic Team keeps focusing on other aspects aside from the main course of Sonic's game play, the franchise will keep spiraling downward. That said, if anything they should prolly make a Wii Ware title that is specifically for Chao Garden and gets add-ons from the other Wii Sonic games. I guess. If only to appease fans like you.
2. I'm no stranger to non-strangers of sarcasm.
3. In my defense, you used the word "you."
4. No, I came to a conclusion that you lack the ability to read. Not how you read. Big difference! >=(
1. I knew Pinball Party had the Chao Garden in it, just never really knew how it worked... Also, I'm just a fan of add-ons, I admit it, I like games for about as much stuff as they can put in it, of course, you can't just say I just like a game for about as much stuff in it, good or bad, I like the game for the game, if it has add-ons, I'll probably have a higher chance of liking the add-ons better than the game...
and I'm gonna try to not take that "fans like me" coment to offence
2. no comment, let's just skip this part from now on
3. I used the word "you" in general, meaning to people in general, not just talking to you specifically
4. this is hard to explain, but i'm gonna try and say this with out losing you or myself for that matter, uh... to know "how" to read, you pretty much need the "ability" to read... idk, it's sounds alot better in my head, I just can't place it into words, understand?
