Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Poll: do you think captain n the game master should be revamped
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes
16.67%
1 16.67%
no
83.33%
5 83.33%
Total 6 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

should they revive captain n the game master
#7
(10-21-2014, 10:56 PM)Kriven Wrote:
(10-21-2014, 06:42 PM)trans the psycopath Wrote:
(10-21-2014, 05:12 PM)Kriven Wrote: I don't think it has much of a future in animation or film, but I can see a Captain N comic book being pretty good.

ya that would be interesting but i think your thinking that i mean just recycle the old shows cast and overall plot just with better writing  and animation which isent what i mean at all. the show is very old  so i dont think given its age that anybody would mind changing the cast and story a bit  different main character  different game characters for the team and mostly different villens.

 i would keep  mother brain and princess lana in  lana was a good character  and would fit in well today mind you with some weapons and skills of her  own. i would also make mother brain more game cannon and have her teamed up with more  compatant villens that are more like her equals and ditch the version made for the origanal captain n. also a less episodic storyline.

Now you're getting into more typical reboot fodder, which always leaves me wondering why a person bothered to reboot at all instead of... well, making something different with inspirations derived from something else?

"Well, let's have a new Captain N, but get rid of Captain N."

I can understand replacing the N-Team with different characters or more faithful interpretations of the characters... I can even understand getting rid of Game Boy and relegating the dog to "Castle Pooch", but when you want to eliminate the main character of the franchise, you should probably just create a new franchise. Same if you want to change their personality into something totally different. I don't mean don't make Kevin a more realistic goofball of a character, but it's really not going to be Captain N if you take Kevin and make him a drug addict or a goth... it's not the same character anymore. It's somebody else with the same name.

but that's exactly what they did in the tv show in the first place. captain n was first a comic in nintendo power but when adapted to a cartoon (and i use the term "adapted"  loosly) they got rid of almost ALL of the original elements and also added in that dog.

but im not saying get rid of captain n im just saying his character was so vague and generic that anyone can be him. also in tv shows its not that uncomen to do something like change the cast and main character  it helps keep from competing with your self and always  being compaired with the origanal. for example in star trek next gen rather then trying to reuse the origanal cast and compete with him self by re inventing kirk endlessly gene rodon berry decided to just make a new cast for it  thus enabling him to simply start over. it was still star trek but a different part of that universe.

 many animes do this to and it can go down like a treat when done right.

also video games do this to all the time mega man zx for instance  doesent use the the actual megaman just some kids that use these things to gain the powers of x zero and others and the main cast changed in between games to. also megaman x  dousent use the origanal megaman they use x the successer model and overall a different person  and character. as well megaman legends the one the one that hooked me on that franchise uses again a different megaman  with nothing in common with the first exept for dominant colors and main weapon. then theres the battle network series which takes place in anouther universe where he isent even a robot there "megaman" is a net navi based on the downloaded mind of lans older brother hub who died years before the series began.

as well castlevania has a different cast every game seriously I think they used Dracula's kid a couple of times but aside form that its been a different main pretty much every game.

pokemon as well every game new characters with almost nothing in common with the original game aside from the titular monsters

sure doing it this way  is a big risk but one that can payoff big for the audiance as it lets new tones and  story lines be added in as well as new motivations with out having to ruin the origanal character by changing him to much. as long as enough is done to ensure it is still connectable to that universe it would go over pretty well. not that your complaints arent valid they are everyone has them when this kind of thing is done  and it can go badly  but when done right every one (or most) will love it for its differences and origanality.

also i always felt that the useless  animal sidekick was a trope best left dead  in cartoons unless it wasent  a real life  type animal or the creature was very useful to the plot with out it being forced usefulness that makes no sense if the character has half a brain. in fact outside of monster battle shows the only animal side kick i have truly enjoyed was  frisket from reboot. so id leave the dog out of a new captain n
Reply
Thanked by:


Messages In This Thread
RE: should they revive captain n the game master - by trans the psycopath - 10-22-2014, 11:16 AM

Forum Jump: