Things that should be removed and not admitted

[Kendotlibero]

Can't Post That On A Christian Spriting Web Site

---

Kinda with Ken here; there's got to be a line drawn as to what's "OK NSFW" and "Not OK NSFW"

There's OK NSFW - art, like Michelangelo's David, that while you shouldn't focus on specific assets, you can comfortably show to a classroom. Then there's not-OK stuff - like very explicit depictions of violence [gore, dismemberment] or explicit depictions of sexual intercourse ["hardcore"]

Bringing things back to gaming, this means you probably don't want to host images from games that has its basis on gameplay revolving around character nudity [in laymen's terms: a porn game] - or do we? See, I've never played it but using it as an example: let's say Hunie Pop (overt nudity example) features characters in various states of undress. Would it be OK to host these various states of undress (as it's basically just like removing layers; nothing is explicit. The character is just standing there but nude)? Full CG art depicting sexually suggestive or explicit sexual activity, of course, isn't allowed: that's porn.

Sorry if I'm all over the place here; I'm just trying to wrap my head around the topic lol.

The thing is, we already have porn games here, why not allow it to the fullest extent instead of dividing "good porn to post" and "porn not good to post"?
Even some of the Greek statues are specifically made to be seen as beautiful and sexy, thay had an entire god about the beauty of the body.
as for greek statues.... It's really that a debate? of course they are allowed, even without the nsfw mark
my suggestion is, or everithing porn-related is allowed, or nothing
or if a game has some kinky image no biggie
even then, let's define what IS porn and what isn't. Bayonetta is fully clothed, but really sexually aggressive, then you have some naked images, like the titans on SnK that aren't

---

i kinda even know poeple that got horny watching the mona lisa, is that allowed if it's in a game?