10-23-2016, 01:52 PM
Very good suggestions. To be honest, I likely need to re-visit the program overall, since I made some assumptions early on that makes working on it now difficult. Yay code refactoring!
There's a current workaround for this: the "Balance/Resize Animation" button. You can set each frame in the animation to be a certain width/height if the animation is currently unbalanced, and lock each current frame to the bottom of the result frame, for example. I have no idea if this is the best solution, since the rest of the application basically assumes that the sheet is balanced already.
(10-05-2016, 10:42 AM)Mighty Jetters Wrote: -Being able to "anchor" frames by their bottoms instead of them all floating top-most within a strip where it's possible? This would make for a cleaner and frankly more accurate arrangement of animation frames.
There's a current workaround for this: the "Balance/Resize Animation" button. You can set each frame in the animation to be a certain width/height if the animation is currently unbalanced, and lock each current frame to the bottom of the result frame, for example. I have no idea if this is the best solution, since the rest of the application basically assumes that the sheet is balanced already.