Koh -Vs- Ocarina of Time

[Zero Kirby]

To Mr. Gors =)

It may not have been the main point, but it sure required a lot of revisiting to the place. A field of flowers with bees moving around in them, a beautiful waterfall to take notice to, a big tree with animals moving all about, etc...stuff like that would have made each trip more worthwhile and appealing than just running across a big empty space.

There ARE butterflies surrounding bush clusters, you can find bugs under a shitton of rocks in the game, the beautiful waterfall is in Zora's River, and as for the big tree with animals moving all about

I think the Deku Tree and all that pollen in the air has you covered, I dunno, along with even more butterflies and bugs under rocks and fish in ponds

Twilight Princess is much more horrible in the regard of Hyrule Field

At least Ocarina of Time feels big as opposed to just being it.

But, I mean, this IS the Nintendo 64 we are talking about. It wasn't an Extended Memory game, either. You're talking about extended AI for enemies (which ones, by the way, don't tell me the bats need to be ultra-smart because they're just bats) and reactive characters and stuff (some of which did have interesting and helpful things to say, but you make it sound like EVERYBODY needs to be interesting, and did you forget about the trading minigame completely oh my god). Look at the draw distance of the game. And as much as I LOVE Link's Awakening, it has just about as much if not more item switching menu time as this game.

Also the game was plenty hard when I was five, so whatever about difficulty man, but now that I and a lot of others are now very good at video games it's not that big a deal

Don't get me wrong, Ocarina of Time is near the bottom of my "good Zeldas" list, but general consensus these days anyway is that Ocarina of Time is good, but not best Zelda, so your oh-so-controversial opinion in your millionth topic is kind of lost on everybody