(06-21-2011, 10:47 AM)Mighty Jetters Wrote: I don't wanna get wrapped up in this...whatever this is, but I just would like to say I agree with Ty and what Nintendo did with the game wasn't lazy. It is possible they could have done more but I know there was probably some reason they didn't. I'm pretty sure their intention was simply to bring back the game onto the newest handheld, but they thought it'd be nice to enhance it a little. They probably didn't want to go overboard with it (you know how some people complain that something is "too far from the perfect original").
Besides... I think anyone who really knows the true value of gaming knows that it's not the graphics that make a great game (look at that monstrosity Bomberman Act Zero, a great example of this), they just add to it. Obviously Nintendo can't make something that everyone's happy with, but they tried. Nintendo always tries. There was effort. Just MHO, everyone thinks differently.
Well Jetters this here is a discussion of the OoT remake, and graphics don't make the game but they're an important part and shouldn't be recycled and charge like 4 times as much at the same time.
the reason they didn't do more is too save money like Tyvon said
yes pk GCN graphics are better than N64 graphics thats why they're better, maybe to the hardcore zelda fans it's a big deal to have all this bonus stuff but to most people it's just the same thing.
MQ is a good bonus as is boss rush, but what is different about inventory