11-20-2010, 08:18 AM
because calling it "snes style pacman world sprite" makes any sense. otherwiuse you could say "its made based on pacman world's style for the snes"
but this is not even closer to be like that. at most, the only thing in common are the eyes, but thats just cause they share the same shape. shading is non existant, antialias is non existant, desing wise is pretty terrible and the animation is completely useless. not to mention you really managed to give him an extra "derp" look with those eyes(wich is the reason they are suposed to be made facing the same side in the original)
for any future project, i'd totally sugest you to avoid naming it as "X styled something" because you clearly no have a single clue on how you should study and reinterpret an specific game's artwork nor ready for anything as elaborated as that. otherwise you just expose yourself to get bashed for failing myserably at comparing what you do with an allready set game's artwork.
but this is not even closer to be like that. at most, the only thing in common are the eyes, but thats just cause they share the same shape. shading is non existant, antialias is non existant, desing wise is pretty terrible and the animation is completely useless. not to mention you really managed to give him an extra "derp" look with those eyes(wich is the reason they are suposed to be made facing the same side in the original)
for any future project, i'd totally sugest you to avoid naming it as "X styled something" because you clearly no have a single clue on how you should study and reinterpret an specific game's artwork nor ready for anything as elaborated as that. otherwise you just expose yourself to get bashed for failing myserably at comparing what you do with an allready set game's artwork.