basically what i'm trying to say is that we gotta get the order straight, this is a sort of chicken and egg problem
in the beginning of this, you were assuming that because it was different, it will probably be bad
but that may not be true, in fact we found reasons where the game might be BETTER for being different
but then you also pointed out games like paper mario and its sequel, which aren't too differentn
but they're also good
I guess the lesson here is that what makes a game good doesn't have to do with whether it's the same or the different
one of them comes before the other
in the beginning of this, you were assuming that because it was different, it will probably be bad
but that may not be true, in fact we found reasons where the game might be BETTER for being different
but then you also pointed out games like paper mario and its sequel, which aren't too differentn
but they're also good
I guess the lesson here is that what makes a game good doesn't have to do with whether it's the same or the different
one of them comes before the other