06-17-2010, 02:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-17-2010, 02:09 AM by PrettyNier.)
sorry, you've calmed down a little i'll try to be nicer!
i don't really see where you're coming from - I mean, I understand why you feel the way you do, but I cannot at all relate. i care more about how good the game is, and how enjoyable it is, rather than "petty" things like what the subject matter is (yarn, pink fluff ball, mushroom kingdom, etc,) and what dimension its going to utilize
i have preferences in those categories, but i'm not at all going to let those get in the way, nor am I going to fallaciously consider them to be more important than the quality of the game itself
i said that those things are irrelevant to how good the game itself is
how can you misinterpret that so badly, jesus
kind of depends a lot on the game itself, you know
i don't really see where you're coming from - I mean, I understand why you feel the way you do, but I cannot at all relate. i care more about how good the game is, and how enjoyable it is, rather than "petty" things like what the subject matter is (yarn, pink fluff ball, mushroom kingdom, etc,) and what dimension its going to utilize
i have preferences in those categories, but i'm not at all going to let those get in the way, nor am I going to fallaciously consider them to be more important than the quality of the game itself
Quote:you basically just said "oh ya if they made a 2D string zelda game it would be the best thing eva and nobody would care about the change in art style.hahahaha what, no
i said that those things are irrelevant to how good the game itself is
how can you misinterpret that so badly, jesus
Quote:Oh and with 3D there is A LOT more to explore and A LOT more to implement into the game if it is 3D, with 2D, you are limited with the amount of gameplay you can getno, this
kind of depends a lot on the game itself, you know