Official E3 Discussion Thread

[Boo]

no, they're not valid complaints - they are petty and ultimately superficial. who cares if it's yarn? doesn't it matter more how the game plays and what is done with the concept? who cares if its 2D? 2D or 3D has no bearing on the quality of the game, it is what is done with the dimension that matters. similarly, subject matter has no bearing on the quality of the game. the reason for this is that they are descriptors, and quality is determined not by what it's descriptors are, but how well these descriptors, these aspects, are dealt with and arranged

neither of these are ""important" as far as the quality of the game goes, or how inventive or interesting it is; by dismissing the whole game based on these two superficial aspects, you are rendering yourself little more than a petulant child

You gotta be the dumbest person ever... just because it's kirby some lower class of character without many games doesn't mean you can just do whatever ya want with the character and style. you basically just said "oh ya if they made a 2D string zelda game it would be the best thing eva and nobody would care about the change in art style.

I think about kirby 64 for THE FUCKIN N64 BACK IN THE DAY BRAH!! and then i think about KIRBY'S EPIC YARN!!!! ya it doesn't even do it justice.

Oh and with 3D there is A LOT more to explore and A LOT more to implement into the game if it is 3D, with 2D, you are limited with the amount of gameplay you can get