The VG Resource
A proposal - Printable Version

+- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html)
+--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html)
+---- Forum: Creative Zone (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-86.html)
+----- Forum: Games Development (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-22.html)
+----- Thread: A proposal (/thread-9638.html)



A proposal - Codestar - 10-31-2009

I've been thinking this for a while now, but why don't we rename this forum to game development? I mean fan games just seems very limiting and there's not that many places people can post about their games on here if they aren't fan games or practically finished.

Anyone else feel the same?


RE: A proposal - Badassbill - 10-31-2009

It makes no sense calling it Fangames if a fair chunk of the projects aren't.


RE: A proposal - Kitsu - 11-01-2009

Yes. I agree heartily.


RE: A proposal - Gold - 11-01-2009

Another agreement form me.


RE: A proposal - Azu - 11-02-2009

(10-31-2009, 03:03 PM)Badassbill Wrote: It makes no sense calling it Fangames if a fair chunk of the projects aren't.

*Looks at the first page*

Fangames
  • Untitled MegamanX Project
  • Sega Genesis Mega Brawler
  • Mega Man X: Corrupted
  • Darkyoshi Mario Engine 4
  • Koopa Bros
  • PokémonJRPG Large-Scale Fangame for PC
  • Pokemon Azure Version!
  • Pokémon Starlight
  • Donkey Kong Country 4
  • SSBB Style Core Engine for Mugen
  • G&W Remake: Turtle Bridge



RE: A proposal - Codestar - 11-02-2009

Because bab obviously meant all projects were fan games and he just posted that as a joke...


RE: A proposal - Codestar - 11-04-2009

bump 4 valid topic needing mod attention*


RE: A proposal - Stooben - 11-05-2009

I support the idea too.


RE: A proposal - GrooveMan.exe - 11-06-2009

I see your point, but at the same time, it's not too important. It would have been a good idea to just make a post about it in the Suggestions thread, though.


RE: A proposal - Codestar - 11-07-2009

<-- was not aware of a suggestions thread