The VG Resource
Split from Love Thread - Printable Version

+- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html)
+--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html)
+---- Forum: The Archives (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-66.html)
+---- Thread: Split from Love Thread (/thread-21144.html)

Pages: 1 2

Split from Love Thread - SKELTON S. SKELETON - 08-09-2012

(08-03-2012, 07:51 AM)Previous Wrote: [Image: S4nb0.png]



(Please don't kill me)

this is so bad
this is just

this is really embarrassing
how is this funny or good at all i seriously cannot figure it out

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Gors - 08-09-2012

its ok sam i can make one of those for you too

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - SKELTON S. SKELETON - 08-09-2012

no i am really curious
your video is basically just, these users exist, they have names that are compound nouns

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Virt - 08-09-2012

All love is pretty much "these users exist so I'll make something of them"

except it's kind

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - SKELTON S. SKELETON - 08-09-2012

I'm sorry dude but i just don't

Understand The Concept of Love


RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Garamonde - 08-09-2012

And I don't understand the concept of bashing love that was intended for other people???
If they enjoy it, it's not your place to say it's terrible without being constructive in any way.

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Mutsukki - 08-09-2012

[Image: 6dXjr.jpg]

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Chutzpar - 08-09-2012

(08-09-2012, 11:15 AM)Mutsukki Wrote: [Image: 6dXjr.jpg]

that can't be sam
y'all told him he wasn't allowed to be a mod

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - SKELTON S. SKELETON - 08-09-2012

tough on fun and the causes of fun

[Image: JUBo7.gif]

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Petie - 08-09-2012

Of course I did, and I stand by that decision. Is this really any way for a mod to behave? I don't intend to start arguing with you here but this needs to be clear from the get-go.

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - SKELTON S. SKELETON - 08-09-2012

i don't have a single thing i could respond with that's not sassy as hell

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Previous - 08-09-2012

Okay kid, party's over, please try not to derail any further.

I'll clean this later~

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - SKELTON S. SKELETON - 08-09-2012

you guys really enjoy getting to basically engage in awesome flamewars and then sweeping them under the rug so nobody can call your character into question, don't you

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Garamonde - 08-09-2012

You guys also seem to enjoy coming here and starting said flamewars when we were minding our own business.

RE: I can't stop loving you (LOVE THREAD 2011-2012) >>References Inside<< - Gors - 08-09-2012

Quote:i don't have a single thing i could respond with that's not sassy as hell
then you could kindly be quiet, please.

I don't think that common sense is that hard to understand, because there's literally no way to justify your pointless bashing of a gift that was directed to other people, especially if they loved it.

Sure, a gift is not always perfect. But more important than the technical value of that, is the sentimental value that's tied to the gift itself. Saying that is being a complete dick to the gift creator and receiver, and consequently the rest ot the people. If you really wanted to give actual C+C to said work, you could very well send previous a PM and kindly pointing out the errors so he could improve. The fact that you couldn't even think up on that possibility just reinforces the fact that you only posted that to attack people. my humble two cents.

also this ends here, as petie said. please back on topic.