+- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html)
+--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html)
+---- Forum: Other Stuff (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-6.html)
+----- Forum: Gaming Discussion (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-18.html)
+------ Forum: Pokemon (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-69.html)
+------ Thread: itt biased pokemon tiers (/thread-13952.html)
RE: itt biased pokemon tiers - water dog - 07-21-2010
(07-06-2010, 11:44 AM)GrooveMan.exe Wrote:Quote:Mudkip, but not its evolutions
Quote:Uxie and Mesprit, but not Azelf
Quote:Unevolved Eevee
Dude, are you fucking high?
also, groveyle but not treecko and sceptile and blaziken but not combusken. he must be fucking high. he also included ninetails and luxray so he must be gay as well
*me replying to an old post*
EDIT: and groove, i think you got confused and added some of the best/cutest/coolest pokemon in 3rd gen to your ugly list. its ok im sure you meant to put them in your favorites list, its ok!!!
RE: itt biased pokemon tiers - Maxpphire - 07-21-2010
I'm still working on my list.
RE: itt biased pokemon tiers - GrooveMan.exe - 07-22-2010
(07-21-2010, 07:55 PM)sexhaver1994 Wrote: EDIT: and groove, i think you got confused and added some of the best/cutest/coolest pokemon in 3rd gen to your ugly list. its ok im sure you meant to put them in your favorites list, its ok!!!
Not really! I guess Delcatty is ok (it's cute, but I'd never use one in a fight; I don't think I've ever even bothered catching a Skitty), but the rest can go fuck themselves. Aggron, Salamence, and Slaking are awesome mechanically; but I really don't like their designs. All fat and knobbly and awful.
But a lot of people dig that look in their Pokémon. It's ok though, they're just unfashionable people.
RE: itt biased pokemon tiers - Chdonga - 07-22-2010
Most of this is ignoring stats and focusing on how cool I think it looks. I use most of the ones on the low tier as much as I do the high tier.
![[Image: poketier.png]](http://a.imageshack.us/img818/5615/poketier.png)
The legendaries are somewhere inbetween top and second tier.
RE: itt biased pokemon tiers - Joseph Styling - 08-04-2010
![[Image: 1stgen.png]](http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/7321/1stgen.png)
![[Image: 2ndgen.png]](http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/5486/2ndgen.png)
![[Image: gen3.png]](http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8940/gen3.png)
![[Image: gen4.png]](http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/2312/gen4.png)
bottom tier is "so shitty it shouldnt exist" tier
RE: itt biased pokemon tiers - Baegal - 08-05-2010
crappy version on gen 1
Yellow is love, light blue is like, purple-ish is dislike, and grey is hate
anything with a heart is one I REALLY love or one i really like, but not enough to get into love.
![[Image: pokemontiers.png]](http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/7798/pokemontiers.png)
probably going to do other gens never because I'm lazy. (MIGHT do gen 3, because I really liked 1 and 3)
RE: itt biased pokemon tiers - Maxpphire - 08-05-2010
I think I'm going to restart mine again doing 1 gen at a time because I lost track.