The VG Resource

One talent I'd say I have is debating, at least when I write it down.

Here's one I got defending Boba Fett
http://www.geocities.com/kyrtuck/DA1.htm

One defending Sonic Adventure 1
http://www.geocities.com/kyrtuck/DA2.htm

And here's one I wrote on EE, that might interest you. (scroll down a little, 8th post, has my name on it)
http://eggmanempire.sonicworld.net/forum...65&start=0

yeah, I know their long. Any types of comments would be nice.

How old were you when you typed these up, ten years old?

It's very hard to focus on the arguments (petty subjects, by the way. You're debating about GAMES and FICTIONAL CHARACTERS) when it's riddled with spelling mistakes:

arguements
irrevelant
disenegrated
dissengration
dissenegrations

I could go on and on. It's called spell check, and even without it, how come your spelling mistakes are so irregular? Like "disintegrated", you have at least three ways of spelling it. There should be no excuse for that, especially if you consider yourself good at debating.

Also, the verb tenses... Have you done this before outside of ranting in the internet?

Mostly they're a battle of opinions. A proper debate uses facts to support your arguments, yet I see none here. You use phrases such as "I always thought", "a game that everyone loved", "Personally I", and no facts. Sure, you use the word "facts", but no reference, and it's shit like how Pokemon don't need to be maintained (which they do, because even in the series, they were shown to be feeding their pokemon. And in the games, there is no way you never needed to go to a Pokecenter AT ALL).

What's the use of "Debating" about opinions? It's not like Global Warming, you can't say "I personally don't think GW is happening/not happening", not when there are facts you could use.

So, errm... Not too good.