01-25-2009, 04:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-25-2009, 04:57 PM by Omegakyogre.)
Sorry, but I can't help but point this out. I love how the same guy that posted this:
Has the gall to say this
About this:
![[Image: eeeeewwwwwewewewgp5.png]](/image.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fimg49.imageshack.us%2Fimg49%2F3196%2Feeeeewwwwwewewewgp5.png&hash=dcc8b8897e7a47d8e39dbb6cc681ed41)
When that 02 is 10x better than that Clean Kirby.
Shyguy Grey, the only thing I really see wrong with 02 there is that the outlines of the wing pieces can be curved a bit more and the lightsource could be more distinctly set as being above them rather than closer to the side. Other than that, I think that's a very nice 02.
Am I really the only one to see the irony in that?
Anyway, here's my Acro:
(01-24-2009, 11:23 PM)StarshadeRovak Wrote:
Has the gall to say this
(01-25-2009, 02:13 AM)StarshadeRovak Wrote: that 02 is cool,out of style,but still cool
About this:
![[Image: eeeeewwwwwewewewgp5.png]](/image.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fimg49.imageshack.us%2Fimg49%2F3196%2Feeeeewwwwwewewewgp5.png&hash=dcc8b8897e7a47d8e39dbb6cc681ed41)
When that 02 is 10x better than that Clean Kirby.
Shyguy Grey, the only thing I really see wrong with 02 there is that the outlines of the wing pieces can be curved a bit more and the lightsource could be more distinctly set as being above them rather than closer to the side. Other than that, I think that's a very nice 02.
Am I really the only one to see the irony in that?
Anyway, here's my Acro:
![[Image: Acro.png]](/image.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fi164.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fu33%2Fomegakyogre%2FAcro.png&hash=1fb90fcb241a0a1bf3f16c03f232070b)